⚠️ This page is not available in the latest version. Please visit the English version for the most up-to-date content. Visit the English version

event 16 juil. 2018

Advocating a New Approach to Governing Water, Energy, and Food Security // Testing the Effects of Message Inoculation and Conclusion Explicitness in the Case of the WEF Nexus

Message sidedness, including its later format inoculation, and conclusion explicitness have been identified by researchers as two prominent message factors that may influence advocating effects. Two-sided messages, which contain both supporting and opposing information about the issue, particularly those containing inoculation components that refute the negative side, are found to be more effective than one-sided messages. Messages with explicit conclusions are also found to be more persuasive than those that let the audience draw the conclusions themselves. This study tested the persuasion effectiveness of message inoculation and conclusion explicitness on a new scientific concept, the water-energy-food (WEF) nexus, of which the public has little knowledge.

Walter walraven 628474 unsplash
https://unsplash.com/photos/9BlA8vech74 (C) Walter Walraven / Unsplash

This study used five randomly assigned groups (total N = 524) and found that messages with explicit conclusions are more persuasive than those with implicit conclusions; however, it found no difference between the effectiveness of one-sided messages and of refutational two-sided messages. The study suggests that a clear conclusion is necessary to communicate the WEF nexus for a better approach to managing the megacrisis of water, energy, and food security.

Download

UCF website

Published

2018

In

Journal of International Crisis and Risk Communication Research, 1(1), 111-134

Restez informé!

Nous vous informons sur les projets, les évènements, les actions, les publications et les nouvelles en cours !