⚠️ This page is not available in the latest version. Please visit the English version for the most up-to-date content. Visit the English version

event 07 июл. 2017

Research // Closing the Governance Gaps in the Water-Energy-Food Nexus

By Nina Weitz, Claudia Strambo, Eric Kemp-Benedict and Måns Nilssona. This paper examines how the integrative environmental governance literature can help to close these gaps. It extracts insights from seven streams of research literature and discusses their relevance for the nexus literature.

Поделиться этой статьей

Dmitri popov 297585
(C) Dmitri Popov / unsplash

The water-energy-food nexus has become a popular concept in environmental change research and policy debates. Proponents suggest that a nexus approach promotes policy coherence through identifying optimal policy mixes and governance arrangements across the water, energy and food sectors. Although the nexus literature identifies some barriers to achieving coherence it does not clearly explain why the barriers are present, what influences them, and how they can be acted upon. These gaps disconnect the nexus literature from the governance processes it ultimately seeks to influence. This paper examines how the integrative environmental governance literature can help to close these gaps. It extracts insights from seven streams of research literature and discusses their relevance for the nexus literature. We argue that connecting the nexus to decision-making processes requires: i) rethinking the boundaries of nexus analysis vis-à-vis other sectors and levels; ii) elaboration of shared principles that can guide decision-making towards policy coherence − or an appropriate form of fragmentation − in different contexts; iii) viewing policy coherence as a continuous process of changing values and perception rather than as an outcome.

Highlights

  • Governance gaps in the nexus disconnect it from decision- and policy making processes.
  • Integrative environmental governance (IEG) provides useful insights to close the gaps.
  • Calls for: i) rethinking boundaries of ‘nexus’ vis-à-vis other sectors and scales;
  • Ii) elaborating shared, contextual principles to guide negotiation of ‘trade-offs’;
  • Iii) viewing policy coherence as a learning process of changing values and mindsets.

Download

ScienceDirect website (openAccess)

Published

July 2017

In

Global Environmental Change, Volume 45, July 2017, Pages 165-173

Поделиться этой страницей

Контактная информация

Cecilia Vey

Будьте в курсе!

Мы информируем Вас о текущих проектах, событиях, мероприятиях, публикациях и новост