event 17 Aug 2016

Research // Water Governance in a Comparative Perspective: From IWRM to a "Nexus" Approach?

By David Benson (University of Exeter), Animesh Gain (Helmholtz-Zentrum Potsdam), Josselin Rouillard (Ecologic Institute). Nexus thinking, in the form of integrating water security with agriculture, energy and climate concerns, is normatively argued to help better transition societies towards greener economies and the wider goal of sustainable development. Yet several issues emerge from the current debate surrounding this concept, namely the extent to which such conceptualisations are genuinely novel, whether they complement (or are replacing) existing environmental governance approaches and how – if deemed normatively desirable – the nexus can be enhanced in national contexts. This paper therefore reviews the burgeoning nexus literature to determine some common indicative criteria before examining its implementation in practice vis-à-vis more established integrated water resources management (IWRM) models.

Logo water alternatives

Evidence from two divergent national contexts, the UK and Bangladesh, suggests that the nexus has not usurped IWRM, while integration between water, energy, climate and agricultural policy objectives is generally limited. Scope for greater merging of nexus thinking within IWRM is then discussed.


Website ResearchGate


Water Alternatives 8(1), February 2015, pages 756-773



Stay up to date!

We inform you about current projects, events, actions, publications and news!