The Nexus Platform is enabled by
The Nexus Platform is enabled by
CECAN understands a major challenge of policy evaluation in complex social settings, is the problem of equifinality. We will respond to the different approaches that may be needed, even for the same problem, with a range of methodological solutions which will be applicable to Nexus topics, and other complex social settings.
CECAN will address the tension between developing evaluation methodologies and ensuring their take up. We are 'challenge-led', testing methodological developments in practice, by scoping complex policy 'case studies' with co-funders, running collaborative evaluation design labs and advising on pilot projects.
CECAN will ensure ongoing interaction with co-funders, policymakers, social scientists and other experts, to form a 'community of practice' across Nexus domains. We will remain responsive to funders' needs and continually challenge ourselves, cross-fertilizing knowledge between Government, the private sector and academia.
There is a recognised need to develop a culture of evaluation and evidence based decision making across Government so that civil servants are better able to address the frequent gap between policy development, implementation and subsequent evaluation. CECAN will support the Civil Service Reform Plan to ensure that decision makers have the "skills and expertise they need to develop and implement policy, using up to date tools and techniques, and have a clear understanding of what works in practice."
'What works in practice' can be very difficult to ascertain, especially with policies that cut across the energy, environment and food Nexus domains, where urgent matters such as the 'energy trilemma', loss of biodiversity, climate change, poverty and challenges to health and well being are entangled in complex ways.
CECAN's team is unique, combining outstanding 'real world' complexity and evaluation expertise in applied social settings. Many of us are already embedded in the evaluation and Nexus communities and we have a shared desire to significantly improve the evaluation of public policy.
Embracing an 'open research' culture of knowledge exchange, CECAN benefits from a growing network of policymakers, practitioners and researchers and a core group of academic and non-academic experts.
The Centre will promote 'evidence based policymaking' by finding ways for the results of evaluation to both inform policy and reflect back onto future policy design - something greatly desired in political and public circles.
By R. Quentin Grafton, John William and Qiang Jiang. “Bottom-up” field-based, crop-hydrological models are used to estimate food production and irrigation water extractions under multiple scenarios of water and nitrogen use and...
By Kerstin Damerau, Anthony G. Patt and Oscar P.R. van Vliet. The sufficient supply of food and energy requires large amounts of fresh water. Mainly required for irrigation, but also processing and cooling purposes, water is one...
Ed. by Lulu Zhang and Kai Schwärzel. The authors claim this is the first book to provide a general overview of Chinese land-policy development and implementation, and highlights the problems and imbalances in the current land...